Cody makes software, writes words, photographs things, slings bottles, and does some odd assortment of other unrelated things. If he’s away from the computer for any length of time, he might be talking movies, concocting drink recipes, delivering unprepared speeches at weddings, or just doing something small for the world.
Nothing looks different in this version, but I haven't poked around in the code.
I doubt this is entirely for Chrome OS, but I would expect that was one of the incentives to do it now rather than later. There are other signs that Gboard is being prepped for Chrome OS, so we're probably not done with seeing features that make as much or more sense on there than on Android.
hey, you know the rules, no deadlines! :p
Seems fine on my P2XL, but you're not the first person I've seen to say something about this.
This has made me really angry in the past. I'm still furious at an app I tried that seemed decent enough in its free mode, but when I paid to unlock the pro features, all of them were either buggy beyond use or literally non-working. I figured this out within a few minutes of paying, so I tried reinstalling the app and then it didn't restore the purchase at all. Within 15 minutes, I realized the pro features were utterly useless, so I requested a refund from the Play Store and they declined it with a message that I should contact the developer and work with them to fix the app. I'm one of the first people to say that developers generally don't get treated fairly by the Play Store (or any of the other online markets), and I'll even defend a lot of Play Store policies that piss off developers and users alike, but in this instance, the dynamic of handling a broken product and sales flow is completely wrong.