The Pixel 4a is hands down a winner, even when stacked up against the already great Pixel 3a from 2019. We gave Google's new budget phone a glowing review, and there are ample reasons why. But at $350, you may be wondering how it compared to the premium Pixel 4, a phone costing more than twice as much ($800). Is there really $450 more smartphone in Google's high-end Pixel? We really don't think so, even when you're just comparing spec tables. But when you get down to the raw experience, the comparison is even more favorable to the 4a: this isn't just a great phone for the money, it's a great phone, no asterisk necessary. And that doesn't exactly make the Pixel 4 look like a strong value in 2020.


The Pixel 4a's internals hew pretty close to the 4's; both have six gigabytes of LPDDR4X RAM and UFS2.1 storage — the base model Pixel 4 comes with 64 gigs, while the only SKU of the 4a has 128. But whereas the Pixel 4 has last year's flagship SOC, the Snapdragon 855, the new 4a packs the Snapdragon 730G — a lesser but more power efficient chipset.

You can see a comparison of the two phones' key specs below. Since the Pixel 4a only comes in one size, we're comparing it with the smaller Pixel 4 here.

Specs: Pixel 4 / Pixel 4a

CPU Snapdragon 855 / Snapdragon 730G
Storage 64 or 128GB (UFS2.1) / 128GB (UFS2.1)
Display 5.7" 1080p OLED, 90 Hz / 5.81" 1080p OLED, 60 Hz
Battery 2800mAh / 3140mAh
Biometrics Face unlock / Rear-mounted fingerprint sensor
Dimensions 147.1 x 68.8 x 8.2 mm, 162g / 144 x 69.4 x 8.2mm, 143g
Headphone jack No / Yes

The Pixel 4a's larger battery is about 12 percent larger than the 4's, but thanks to its more efficient chipset, real-world gains are much greater. David says he manages up to four and a half hours of screen time with particularly heavy use — better on normal days. That's impressive for such a reasonably-sized phone. There's no wireless charging here, but the 4a retains the same 18W wired charging as the 4.

The 4a's OLED display is undoubtedly inferior to the Pixel 4a's on things like outdoor brightness, ambient contrast, and black levels (crushing is an issue). But as budget phone OLEDs go, it's perfectly fine—someone upgrading for a 3 or 4 year old "flagship" would probably even find it impressive, as the technology has come a long way in the last few years.

On performance, there's no doubt the Pixel 4'a 90Hz refresh display and Snapdragon 855 feel snappier than the 4a. But the difference is less than you'd expect. The Snapdragon 730G is no slouch, and for all but intensive gaming use, few people are going to notice a huge difference between the two phones day to day. With 6GB of RAM and 128GB of UFS 2.1 storage, the 4a also feels much more future-proof than the outgoing 3a, and we see no reason it shouldn't be able to age as gracefully as the much more expensive Pixel 4.


The Pixel 4 set a new bar for mobile photography when it launched. It has a 12.2-megapixel primary camera and a 16-megapixel telephoto shooter, but camera hardware is almost irrelevant in Google's photo equation; software magic is where it's at here. Even though it has only one 12.2-megapixel rear-facing camera, the Pixel 4a produces shots that go toe-to-toe with its older cousin — and any other phone on the market today.

Left: Photo from Pixel 4. Right: Photo from Pixel 4a.

In the Pixel 4a, you do lose the versatility of the Pixel 4's telephoto lens, but your Instagram game won't be materially worse for choosing the more economical phone. In fact, photos are basically identical. You can check out a gallery of comparison photos here.

Design and materials

While divisive, I personally really like the Pixel 4's design. The 4a borrows a lot of the aesthetic: the general shape, the soft edges, the unnecessarily square camera module. It differs in a few ways, though. First, whereas the Pixel 4 was glass, the 4a is plastic. That's to be expected; the 3a was plastic too. But the 4a is only available in black, and the combination of the texture and color of the finish means it really shows oil from your hands. You'll probably want a case or skin.

Around front, you'll notice the 4a lacks the "forehead" bezel of the 4. It only has one front-facing camera, set in a hole-punch cutout. The screen is coated in Gorilla Glass 3, an older and softer glass than the Pixel 4's Gorilla Glass 5. The 4a also lacks the IP68 water and dust resistance of the Pixel 4, but that's standard fare for a budget phone.


This one's pretty cut and dry. The Pixel 4 starts at $799. The 4a is $349 — less than half the price. The Pixel 4 has better build quality, better performance, a display with a higher refresh rate, wireless charging, face unlock, and an additional camera. But those things probably won't be worth the markup for most buyers, especially so late into the Pixel 4's life and especially with the Pixel 5 coming so soon (probably).

Short of a killer deal on the Pixel 4, most people looking to buy a new Pixel in the immediate future should probably go for the Pixel 4a.