Earlier this year, Blu released what would end up being my favorite phone from the manufacturer today: the Vivo Air. It was super sleek and thin, had a beautiful display, and was a generally great phone for just $199. Today, Blu announced the Air's successor, the Vivo Air LTE.This phone basically corrects the weaknesses found in the original Air by bumping the RAM up to 2GB and adding LTE. This, of course, means the processor has also changed, and Blu has chosen to go with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 this time around. Otherwise, most of the other specs are the same:

SPECS

Display

4.8-inch 1280x720 Super AMOLED with Gorilla Glass 3

Processor

1.2GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 410

RAM

2GB

Camera

8MP rear, 5MP front

Storage

16GB

Ports

microUSB 2.0, 3.5mm audio

Wireless

GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900, HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100, LTE 1700 (4) / 1900 (2) / 2600 (7), Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot, Bluetooth 4.0

Dimensions

141.9 x 68.1 x 5.1mm, 98 grams

Battery

2050 mAh

OS

Android 5.0.2 (slated to get Marshmallow in Q1 2016)

Available colors

Black, White

Price

$199

Buy

Pre-Order exclusively on Amazon

It's really an incremental update, but it's a pretty significant incremental update...if that makes sense. The extra gig of RAM was definitely much-needed, and the addition of LTE is always a welcome one. Without getting into too many details, I can already tell you that it's probably worth upgrading if you're carrying the original Vivo Air and like it.

But if you want the details, let's talk about those now.

Appearance, Hardware, and Build Quality

Unsurprisingly, the Vivo Air LTE looks almost identical to the original Vivo Air. At 5.1 mm, it's super thin, and at only 98 grams, it's equally as light - pretty much what you'd expect from a phone that's technically succeeding the thinnest phone on the market at release time.

Here's a quick rundown of the physical things that are different about the two phones: the Air LTE's power button has been moved from the left side to the right, the headphone jack is now on the left side of the bottom instead of the right, the microUSB port is offset to the right instead of centered, and the LED flash is beside the camera instead of below it. Blu also moved its logo from the bottom of the backside to around the middle.

But the biggest change aesthetically is my personal favorite: the capacitive keys have been replaced by on-screen navigation. For this, I am thankful. So, so thankful.

White: Vivo Air; Black: Vivo Air LTE

Otherwise, these two look really, really similar.

And of course there are the differences under the hood: processor, LTE, and RAM. Two of those changes are good, and there's no real argument to make there. The other, however, is a little more questionable.

Naturally, I'm talking about the move from the octa-core Mediatek MT6592 to the quad-core Snapdragon 410. There are things to like about the Snapdragon - like Qualcomm's habit of actually releasing the source code, for example - but there are also things to like more about the Mediatek...like performance. But we'll get into that below.

The displays of these two phones are basically identical, which really isn't a bad thing - I love the Vivo Air's display, so by default I love this one too. While the cameras are identical in megapixel count, I think the Air LTE's 8MP shooter is actually better - images just seem to be brighter and sharper. Here are some sample shots from its camera (and for comparison, here is a link back to the camera section of the original Vivo Air review).

Software and Performance

The Vivo Air LTE is running Lollipop (5.0.2) out of the box (which the Vivo Air should be running by now, but Blu still hasn't pushed the update), but unlike its predecessor, is sporting a basically stock system. That's good, because Lollipop is too beautiful to throw some tacky-looking skin on top of.

Basically, the primary additions that you'll find on the Air LTE are options to add battery percent to the status bar and scheduled power on/off settings. Oh, and it has a different keyboard - Touchpal 2015. I actually kind of like it, to be honest.

Otherwise, it's stock everything.

But now it's time to talk about performance. Like I've already said, the additional gig of RAM was really needed the first go around, so I'm really glad to see that Blu added it here. I wish they would've doubled the storage, too, because 16GB is just not enough. 32GB should be standard across the board at this point.

And then there's the processor. I'll be the first to admit that I'm not a big fan of the Snapdragon 410, especially when compared to the octa-core Mediatek stuff Blu has been using in most of its newer handsets. Compared to the quad-core Mediatek stuff (like the one in the Studio Energy, Studio G, Vivo Seflie, Energy X Plus, etc.), however, it's actually better. So, really, like I said about the Life One, which uses the same processor - it's right in the center of Blu's catalog: slower than things like the original Vivo Air, but faster than some of the other recent phones with a quad-core Mediatek. I guess you can slice that however you want.

Now, I'm generally not big on benchmarks, but I will tell you this: the original Vivo Air scores nearly 10k more on Antutu than the Air LTE (32,430 vs 22,439); in Geekbench, the Air LTE's single-core score is actually slightly higher (429 vs 480), but the multi-core score is again no contest with the original Air once again winner (2,299 vs 1,492).

While I don't invest a lot into those numbers, they translate to real-world use here: the Vivo Air is simply faster than the Air LTE. But, it's severely lacking in the RAM department, and the Air LTE has a better camera. So, really, I guess it's a wash.

Rating /10

Blu Vivo Air LTE

Overall, the Air LTE is a good upgrade to the original Vivo Air, though I have to say I'm disappointed in the processor change - I wish they would've at least gone with a 610 (or something else with more oomph). The 410 just leaves me wanting, where the original Vivo Air never made me feel that way, at least not when it came to horsepower. The RAM, of course, is a different story.

So yeah, I'm glad to see the additional gig of RAM here, and the improved cameras are also a nice touch. I also like that Blu got rid of the physical keys and upgraded to on-screen navigation, and Lollipop is also a nice touch here. The Air LTE is slated to get Marshmallow in the first quarter of 2016, so let's hope that Blu sticks to that plan - considering this phone is running a Qualcomm chip, it shouldn't be too difficult to get everything running pretty quickly.

But the real question is: should you buy this phone? Well, if you're in the market for a $200 phone with a beautiful display, good camera, excellent build quality, and decent performance, all without having to give up LTE? Then I say yes. Honestly, the only "dealbreakers" I see here are the 410 and the limited storage, so if you can get past that, then there's no real reason to not consider this handset.

PRESS RELEASE