Android Police

Neither. I would buy the Galaxy Nexus again.

Uh, neither. I'll take the GNex over these two.

Neither really, waiting for the Snapdragon S4 to be released as a quad core in something :)

the pentile amoled alone is enough to keep customers away
the burn-in issue
true ppi of SGS3 = spec ppi /3 * 2 = 204, which is way below 312 of HTC one x

HTC One, because it looks and feels more like a premium device.

One X (that's the European Tegra 3-sporting version, incidentally). I already did. 32 GiB of storage is enough, at least for me. And that screen... just Wow. I'm in love with my new phone. I'm very glad to own it.

HTC made it easy, hardware-wise with this one....  No removable battery, no MicroSD card slot, I'm going with the SGSIII this summer for sure....  I was planning to already, unless Sammy really screwed something up, but they didn't - there aren't any LEGITIMATE complaints I'm hearing you all talk about with the Galaxy S III!  I just hear a bunch of whining OR hating, and much of it has been coming from current GNex owners....  Look, your phone was great, and I say was because those specs would have been nice LAST summer, but even though the Skyrocket passed FCC 2.5 months BEFORE the LTE GNex did, it still has better specs all the way around!

Like this, without having either in my hands ever... The GSIII
But mainly because of the battery of it BUT, if you tell me that the One X's battery lasts a full day with heavy use I would consider it because I've read most places that the screen is better and I find the One X much better looking...
Although I don't like sense all that much I would probably run CM9 in either of them anyway...

I would say One X, if I could unlock the bootloader, root and flash AOKP or CM9 or some other stock rom.

I am waiting for the next major superphone to come through Verizon. The guy there said the next one is like HTC EDGE  He said it was a sequel to the Rezound with a quad core processor and that sounds an awfully like the One series or Incredible HD under a different name.  I will pick which ever has battery life and accepts the 32 gb micro sd card I just bought for 12 dollars online. I have had this droid x forever!

I voted for the HTC One X if I had to choose between these 2. I am a Galaxy Nexus owner and can say that you do not notice the pentile on the screen at all and have never met one person that does. If you do then you must have great vision or hold your phone really close to your face. Neither one of these phones are enough of an upgrade to the Galaxy Nexus to want to drop it for them. I will wait for the next Nexus and Android Jelly Bean!

You mean Dual-core Snapdragon?

Gimme the screen of the HTC One X, the hardware (4412 Exynos) of the SGS3, and the stock vanilla of the GNex and we'll be in business

when are they going to release something like this for Verizon. I am tired of Motorola just not keeping up. 

I am not sure I can definitely consider one a superior device to another, but all else being equal I know which company I trust when it comes to being able to flash.

Get with the program HTC.

Having top set Hardware and benchmarks doesnt make a phone complete... It should look professional, robustic and stand out of the crowd.. 
Surely GS3 has a top notch power inside, but the design is a low end profile lawyers make. They just want to escape lawsuits from Apple..
Though OneX has a bit lower benchmarks than GS3, the sum up of overall design, performance, features etc in oneX wins the heart of customer... 

Definitely Samsung. HTC technical support disappoints me utterly

one thing we can all agree on is both phones are 100x better than the iphone lmfao. i feel so sorry for blind moronic isheep

I would say the HTC but the non removable battery is a major down point for me as it's not unknown for me to plough through 2 batteries in a day on my SGSII.

HTC One X sure is better looking than the SGS3. But no matter what, I'm buying the SGS3.

I would personally like the look & feel of the HTC One X vs the SGS III but feature wise, i would go for the SGS III

Given the fact that the S-III is going to be a monster I can deal with the cons of the device, the one that mainly gets me is the fact that it's a damn legal phone (so no one says you look like this looks give me money)

Did no one notice it yet, or is it not such a big issue? S3's hardware buttons are just Menu, Home and Back. There is no multi-task button.
They are still stuck in the past, this phone is not designed for ICS at all. I thought having the hardware button was a deal breaker for 1X, but having an obsolete button instead of the frequently used one is a poor design choice.
Now, I guess you can hold home button down to access the list of running apps. It will still work, but that is so 2009 (I guess it is from eclair).
Google is advicing developers to follow certain UI standards for ICS and implement a software menu button to be placed on top right corner. We bitch about those who takes time to implement it. But eventually they fix it to play nice with ICS. In this case, it is a hardware button for heaven's sake, once you buy the phone you are stuck with it for at least a year.

It is definitely a deal breaker for me. But, I have voted for S3 as not having a micro-sd slot and removable battery is worse.

Opinion is Opinion.....I prefer Plasma TV's and LED over any LCD Tv's......personal preference....am I wrong....HELL no.........its what you prefer.....I have put my Galaxy Note along side the One X and the Note to me is the HANDS down winner.....I just love the Super AMOLED HD screen..but if you don't who really gives a rats ass....get the One X......but in terms of the other software specs, the GS3 wins...that's not opinion....its FACTS........