The amount of Bluetooth speakers on the market could easily boggle one's mind, with more manufacturers getting in the game every day. And while there are many worthy competitors in this somewhat-crowded market, one of our favorites in the "small and portable" category is easily the Braven 600 –  a small speaker with a lot to offer.

Today, we're taking a look at the 600's big brothers, and Braven's competitors with Jawbone's Big Jambox: the 850 and 855s ($300 each). The sound quality and size are virtually identical with this pair, with the primary difference being the 855s' rough-and-rugged build quality. It's built to take a fall, and its IPX3 water resistance means you can take this one to the beach without fear of ruining your $300 speaker.

wm_IMG_3388 wm_IMG_5168

Since the 850 and 855s are largely the same outside of aesthetics, let's go in contrast to my normal speaker review methods and talk about sound first. Then we'll take a look at the exterior and what makes them different from one another.

Sound Quality

While the 850/855s are still considered "portable" speakers, you'll immediately notice that they're actually pretty large. This, of course, means they're capable of producing more sound, stronger bass, and substantial volume. I actually found the sound quality to be somewhat of an interesting thing to focus on, because it can be very hit-and-miss depending on what you're listening to. Before I get into that, though, I want to talk about the speakers' SRS WOW HD setting. Yeah, that's really what it's called.


Right out of the box, you'll find that these speakers sound good, but a little "small." That was my experience anyway. After reading up on what they have to offer, however, I noticed the option to enable SRS WOW HD by pressing both volume buttons at the same time – the difference is not only immediate, but it's also drastic. I've honestly yet to figure out why this isn't enabled by default, nor do I understand why anyone would want to listen without the feature enabled. With SRS enabled, the bass is lower, treble is higher, and every sound is more pronounced. It sounds great by comparison – and that's honestly why I think this feature is there in the first place. I'm convinced that Braven chose to make this an optional setting just so users would hear the drastic difference and it would seem like a much better speaker than the initial impression leads on.

Here's a brief look at the sound with SRS disabled vs. enabled:

  • With SRS disabled: Think about how everything sounds with a flat EQ – that's basically what you'll hear with SRS disabled. Bass is weak, highs are dull, and everything in between is just kind of meh. There just isn't a lot of feeling to the music. It's, well, flat.
  • With SRS enabled: It's like living in an entirely different world. Imagine the flat EQ from above, now picture it being instantly tweaked to your favorite setting – everything just comes to life. That's what SRS does for this speaker; it brings a new depth to the bass, while mids and treble just pop out into your face. It sounds quite fantastic – at least until you crank the volume and play something with a lot of intense sound. Allow me to explain.

I guess at this point, a little backtracking is necessary. Earlier I said I don't see why anyone would want to listen with SRS disabled. I guess that isn't entirely true, because at high volumes, the speaker simply can't handle the SRS setting – it's just too much. Too much bass, too much treble; it just distorts. Thus, disabling it will allow everything to clean up at higher volume... though the audio quality won't be as good.

The 850/855s both feature 20w speakers, which can definitely bring the volume, especially considering the size of the unit itself. When cranked all the way up, it can fill a modern-sized house (1500-2500 square feet), and can easily provide ample tunes when used in an outdoor environment, too. It also responds very well to EQ adjustments – even the slightest tweak creates an audible difference.

Features and Build Quality


While the 850 and 855s are quite different on the outside, their features are a mirror image of each other. Both units can be daisy chained (even with each other), have auxiliary inputs for non-Bluetooth devices, and can be used as portable chargers. The latter feature is actually quite useful, and since both units pack 8,800mAh batteries, there's plenty of juice to spare. The downside, however, is that they're both quite heavy, weighing in at a whopping 3lbs. 5.5oz. I actually feel like this makes it too large to be considered portable, but still too small to be categorized with something like the Logitech UE Boombox (which features a handle for easier portability).

You're probably wondering exactly how much play time that 8,800mAh juice pack will provide you with. Braven rates it somewhere around 20 hours, and I found this to be pretty dead-on. I was able to use the 850 for two days of constant use while working (roughly 10 hours each day) before it finally kicked the bucket at the end of day two. Of course, if you have the volume maxed for hours on end, you'll probably kill it quicker, but I wouldn't expect to get anything less than 17 or 18 hours out of it, even under extreme listening conditions. Naturally, though, that will decrease the more you use it as a charger.

wm_IMG_3390 wm_IMG_3391


It's not all good, though – there are a few annoyances here. First and foremost, the lack of adopting the now-standard microUSB charging port and opting to go with a proprietary charger is a huge ding for both the 850 and 855s. Also, for some weird reason, both units auto-power down after a set amount of time without use, even when plugged in. This makes no sense to me on any level – if it's on AC power, there's no reason it should ever turn off.

Otherwise, the only other complaint is exclusive to the 855s; namely its rubbery protective coating. It's a dust magnet, and for some reason unknown to me, Braven decided to design it with grooves all around the outside, making it nearly impossible to completely remove all the debris. It's annoying. If you're not extremely anal about things like that, however, it probably won't bother you.

wm_IMG_3402 wm_IMG_5180

Stylistically, both speakers are actually quite similar to not only each other, but also Braven's past offerings – the same metal grate graces both the front and back of each. The controls – power, phone, play/pause, volume up, and volume down – are on top, and the full-size USB port, aux out, charging port, and battery gauge can be found on the right side. I would really like to have seen track navigation controls outside of play and pause, as it's often easier to just reach up and touch the speaker than to unlock my phone to change the track. Alas, this is just not the case.

Naturally, all of the buttons and ports are open and accessible on the 850, but they're all protected by the aforementioned rubber coating on the 855s. Either way, both units are built like tanks, though the 855s' splashproof coating and rubberized exterior do give it a bit of an edge in that category.


wm_IMG_5177 wm_IMG_3394

The Bluetooth speaker market is quickly becoming a crowded one, so manufacturers need to not only give their offerings something that makes them stand out in the crowd, but also price them accordingly. At $300, the Braven 850 and 855s are on the pricier side of the market, but the superb build and audio quality, and ability to use them as portable chargers make both an enticing buy, as long as you can get past the weight.

Ultimately, I think a portable Bluetooth speaker should actually be portable, which is why I'd elect to go a different direction. If you plan on using it around the house more often than on-the-go, however, it's hard to go wrong with the 855 or 855s.

Buy: Braven 850, Braven 855s

Cameron Summerson
Cameron is a self-made geek, Android enthusiast, horror movie fanatic, musician, and cyclist. When he's not pounding keys here at AP, you can find him spending time with his wife and kids, plucking away on the 6-string, spinning on the streets, or watching The Texas Chainsaw Massacre on repeat.

  • Cory_S

    I really wish Chromecast could be hooked up to stuff like this for Google Music. it would be a total Sonos killer.

  • n0th1ng_r3al

    Proprietary charger? No deal.

    • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

      I really hate that manufacturers keep insisting on skipping the standard option, like MicroUSB. Even if it charges twice as slow, don't leave it out.

  • Eddie J Camacho

    For that I buy me a BOSE system which is 1000 times better

    • AnusPounder

      If you honestly believe that, then go buy an iPhone too.

      • Eddie J Camacho

        I like my android I only use Apple for photoshop, CAD, interior design stuff, but I stick with android since its open sourced not locked in like Apple, when that device can be much more but its for people who don't understand how to manipulate android, many people ask me why my s3 look so much better cause it takes time to understand the tech. I'm not a simple person I love the complexity of android

    • Cheeseball

      No Highs? No Lows? Must be Bose!

      • Eddie J Camacho

        Bose the best especially when I put more than 5 portable speakers to the test, so bose is the best overall especially when it comes to working out

  • Matthew Fry

    Cameron, while I'm pretty quick to jump on the "no microusb? get outta here!" bandwagon, is it possible they went with a non-microusb solution to charge the battery faster? You've charged 8-10A powerbanks before, I'm sure. You know they take for friggin ever. Do you know what the wattage or voltage/amperage of the charger is? If it's significantly more than the max output of microusb, I would count that as a pro vs a con.

    • Elias

      Definitely. The tiny microusb port can't take more than 2A, and 2A at 5v is a mere 10w. For a 20w speaker (plus inneficiencies in amplifier and voltage conversion), you'd be discharging the thing even if it was plugged in.
      However, the option to charge it via standard usb if no other way is available would surely be nice.

      • Matthew Fry

        Not to mention if it were charging another device at the same time. Although, now that I think about it, it probably doesn't support that.

    • http://www.mightydwarf.com/ JJ Matt.

      You make an excellent point.

    • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

      Oh, of course they have, but if they gave MicroUSB as an option, it'd make the speaker 100% more portable and useful, even if it charges slower when using it.

      • Matthew Fry

        I guess it depends on whether they are trying to emphasize the charger aspect (charges fast, charges your devices) or it's portability (take it anywhere, charges with microusb).

        What we need is a secondary standard for high amperage charging. Preferably something that uses extra pins and can still take an ordinary microUSB cable in a pinch.

        • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

          Well, regular MicroUSB can charge at 2A (it's your laptop's fault if it can only output 0.5A), which is plenty for even larger speakers like this. USB 3.0 probably improves on that, though I haven't looked into it. Samsung ships chargers with the Galaxy S4, for example, that's 2A, which is enough to power their wireless charging units too. A similar charger would have surely sufficed here for the Braven...

          • Matthew Fry

            Of course a 2A microUSB charger would work. it's just a balancing game. My Nexus 10 can actually drain faster than it charges and die while plugged in. It could probably do with a faster charger.

            Qualcomm's Quick Charge 2.0 will allow up to 4A+ http://www.qualcomm.com/chipsets/quick-charge

    • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

      Just checked, the stock charger is 3A, so it should charge pretty fast.

      • Chuck

        It's 3A at 12 Volts (36 W) vs micro USB max of 2A @ 5 V (10 W). Makes perfect sense.

  • http://atlantatechblog.com/ LinkDJ

    Wait, that space heater also plays music?

    • http://www.mightydwarf.com/ JJ Matt.

      Good one :-)

  • http://www.mightydwarf.com/ JJ Matt.

    I agree with your sentiment that a portable speaker should be portable.

    Matthew Fry has an excellent point about the adapter - what is the output?

    • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

      The output is 3A, so pretty up there.

  • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

    I really wish Braven would include the ability to disable the damn auto-shutoff on AC power. I have to turn it back on 3 times a day. Fuuuuuu

  • craig

    Which one of these is a better buy: The above mentioned Braven 850 or UE Boombox? I need a loud speaker to hear in the machine shop I work in. I like the boombox, but the 6 hour long battery sucks, wish it was the 18-20 like the braven. Aside from loud volume, I'm an audiophile who DEFINITELY notices superior sounding equiptment, and its VERY important. Thanks for any help guys.