When it comes to the newest generation of phones, "budget" is closer to "flagship" than ever before. Two months ago, I reviewed the free-on-contract Pantech Marauder and came away highly impressed. Ron, too, reviewed the $100 Motorola Razr M and said "This is what budget phones are like now? Where do I sign up?" The old budget formula of taking last-gen hardware and slapping it in a cheap chassis has given way to current-gen hardware in a better chassis - not to mention that the optimizations and polish of Android 4.0 make the experience better than ever on virtually any level of hardware.

The LG Escape fits that profile: it has a dual-core Snapdragon S4 clocked at 1.2GHz, 1GB of RAM, and Android 4.0. With a 4.3" qHD screen, whopping 2150mAh battery, and $50 price tag, it certainly sounds like a recipe for success. But is there a fatal flaw somewhere, as so commonly afflicts budget phones? Let's find out.


The Specs

  • Price: $50 with new two-year contract, $400 retail
  • CPU: 1.2GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 (MSM8960L)
  • RAM: 1GB
  • Storage: 4GB total, about 1.85GB usable + microSD slot
  • Display: 4.3" qHD (540 x 960) IPS display
  • Battery: 2150mAh (!)
  • Cameras: 5MP rear, 1.3MP front
  • Android: 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
  • Connectivity: 3.5mm headphone, microUSB, 802.11b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0, LTE
  • Dimensions: 4.96" x 2.54" x 0.37" (126 x 95 x 9mm), 4.5oz (128g)

The Good:

  • With a 4.3" screen and rather sleek dimensions, the Escape is one hell of an attractive, pocketable package. Coupled with good looks, it does a fantastic job of hiding the fact that it's actually a budget device at the core. (Though, unfortunately, there are no small flagships anymore, so any tech lover will know your 4.3" phone isn't a flagship - if you care about that sort of thing.)
  • Performance is excellent thanks to the speedy 1.2GHz dual-core S4 CPU, 1GB of RAM, and Android 4.0.
  • Thanks to the beefy (2150mAh) battery (and probably helped by the lack of LTE in my area), battery life is very good.
  • Build quality is fantastic. It feels well put together and though the plastic backplate is thin, it still feels very durable.
  • The backplate is removable, as is the battery. Plus, the microSD card (also under the backplate) isn't obstructed by the battery, so you can swap it out very easily.
  • At $50 on contract, this phone is an absolute bargain.

The Bad:

  • The plastic around the edge feels cheap. (Thankfully, it's around the edge, and not the whole thing, so the impact is minimal.)
  • LG's Optimus UI still feels like an ugly(ish) iPhone/TouchWiz rip-off. Also, it doesn't have an automatic brightness setting. What the hell, LG?
  • The display's colors are washed out, so that it almost seems like the brightness is cranked up even when it's set very low.
  • Picture quality isn't great, and not having a flash for the rear camera certainly doesn't help. (More importantly, that means no flashlight!)

Deep Dive

Design & Build


The design is simple: a plastic backplate that's removable (and very flexibile once it's removed), with fake carbon fiber covered in a thick layer of pretend clear coat. The rounded sides are a continuous band of gray plastic with 45° imprints; flanking that band are faux-chrome bands. The materials on the sides aren't the highest quality, but they're very minimal.  Finally, the front is protected by Gorilla Glass. It all comes together well, and the glossy coating on the back provides a softer, grippier, more comfortable feel than the cold, hard plastics usually found on budget devices.

wm_IMG_1929 wm_IMG_1940

As for details: on the front are the capacitive buttons at the bottom (adhering to Holo guidelines, right down to the shape), volume buttons on the top left, power on the top right, charging on the bottom, and headphone jack on the top left. Around back, the speaker is near the bottom left, and the camera is top center.

wm_IMG_1943 wm_IMG_1939  wm_IMG_1936

The design is generic, sure, but it's highly functional, sleek, and feels very good to hold. Compared to a flagship, sure, the plastics are a bit cheap. But as a budget device, I have nothing but praise.



It's funny to think back to the launch of the HTC EVO, when its 4.3" screen was considered massive. Today that's positively tame, with all current-gen flagships sporting displays in excess of 4.5". There are certainly upsides to having bigger screens, but I have to admit: the 4.3" display on the Escape is very, very refreshing. I never thought "this could benefit from a little more screen real estate," and it feels fantastic to hold. I can comfortably reach every corner of the screen without stretching my hand, and it fits in pockets just a bit better.

wm_IMG_1947 wm_IMG_1949 wm_IMG_1951

The screen may be the perfect size, but the display itself isn't perfect. The display always looks like the brightness is turned up to 100%, even when it's only at 20% - in other words, it looks washed out. Consequently, black levels are also at the lower end of average, though not bad. Viewing angles are good but not great, as is pixel density. At no point do you feel the display lacks for pixels and it's certainly not as if you can count them.

In sum: a competent display, though it fails to stand out.


As recently as a few days ago, I called LG's Optimus UI "... an ugly TouchWiz rip-off." And I certainly find a lot of aspects unattractive or even ugly: the icons, lockscreen, proprietary widgets, and out-of-the-box-visual-catastrophe, in particular:

Screenshot_2012-10-09-19-46-42 Screenshot_2012-10-09-19-46-52 Screenshot_2012-10-09-19-46-14

Left: lock screen. Center: lock screen as I'm mid-swipe to unlock. Right: stock homescreen.

Though it's about as aesthetically as pleasing as Quasimodo out of the box, a simple change of wallpaper goes a long way. More importantly, LG offers a selection of customization options as well. For example, you can modify the lockscreen clock style and icons, among other minor tweaks. The home screen, too, allows you to change the swipe effect (panorama is the way to go, trust me) in addition to a few other details. Nothing groundbreaking since most UIs offer many of the same tweaks, but noteworthy nonetheless.

Screenshot_2012-10-08-20-50-47 Screenshot_2012-10-08-20-50-58 Screenshot_2012-10-08-20-50-52

As with any UI, not all is perfect (aside from all the ugly, that is). Annoyingly, LG has opted to remove all the stock Android widgets in favor of AT&T and their own proprietary widgets... which are, as previously mentioned, ugly. The bloat is absolutely unbelievable, though much of it comes from AT&T: Amazon Kindle, AT&T Code Scanner, AT&T FamilyMap, AT&T Locker, AT&T Navigator, AT&T Ready2Go, AT&T Smart Wi-Fi, Live TV, Messages (in addition to Messaging) and Messenger), myAT&T,  Note Pad, Polaris Office, Qik Lite, SmartShare, Task Manager, Video layer, Video Wiz, Weather, and YPmobile. Some of those are quite useful, without a doubt. Or would be, except a number of them show in the app drawer but are actually just icons to download the app from the Play Store. The remainder are not at useful, and all add clutter out of the box.

Screenshot_2012-10-08-20-50-36 Screenshot_2012-10-08-20-49-27 Screenshot_2012-10-08-20-49-46

It's annoying that there are four video-related apps out of the box (Movies, Video Player, Video Wiz, and Play Movies & TV). It's infinitely worse that when you open the Movies app, you're told that you actually need to install it first. But in order to install it, you need to enable installation of non-Market applications. Hit okay and you're greeted by the package installer, with a popup that says "The application you are installing will replace another application." Okay... what application is going to be replaced? Keep in mind, this is a budget phone which will likely be purchased by those who aren't exactly technologically inclined. I feel bad for teenagers everywhere, who will undoubtedly be playing the role of tech support when a family member inadvertently screws up something because of AT&T's greed.

Screenshot_2012-10-09-19-14-42 Screenshot_2012-10-08-21-12-58 Screenshot_2012-10-08-21-21-02

"You don't need automatic brightness... you need four different movie apps."

Still, all told, the UI is acceptable, especially once you tweak a few details. And if that's not good enough for you? Well, there are certainly plenty of alternative launchers available.

Performance & Battery Life


The UI may be ugly, but it's certainly well coded: I experienced precisely 0 instances of lag on the Escape, even when using live wallpapers. Interactions are handled with gusto and smoothness. As I've said before, that impressive performance is the result of a few factors: first, Android 4.0+ (Ice Cream Sandwich) is extremely polished, and runs very well on nearly any level of hardware. Second, the Snapdragon CPU is very capable, and third, a full gig of RAM helps the prior two factors. (In fact, the experience is very much the opposite of that of the much higher-end Intuition - surprising, given that phone's more powerful CPU but otherwise identical UI.)

wm_IMG_1927 wm_IMG_1931 wm_IMG_1933 

Battery life is equally as impressive, though that may in part be because there's no AT&T LTE in my area to drain it faster. Out of the box, I saw over two days of light use on one charge. Even with heavy use, the Escape will handily get you through a full (long) day, though those figures are on 3G+ (HSPA+), not 4G (LTE).



As I've said before, you can't make a budget device without making a few compromises to get the price down. The trick, of course, is to sacrifice the right things in the right places. That's exactly what LG has done with the Escape: check all the right smartphone boxes, and yet cut only a few mostly minor corners. With good specs and build, great performance, and a relatively low price, the Escape is the best budget device I've ever reviewed.

Aaron Gingrich
Aaron is a geek who has always had a passion for technology. When not working or writing, he can be found spending time with his family, playing a game, or watching a movie.

  • http://brgulker.wordpress.com/ brgulker

    I saw the Gnex at Best Buy this week for $50...

    • Dan

      OH! Now that would be a cool roundup article. The 5 best $50 phones and the 5 best free phones.

      • Dan

        By that, I mean as they are priced right now, today.

  • http://twitter.com/MagicXB Nick

    No rear camera flash? Come on, even the horrible Motorola Backflip from 2 years ago had a rear camera flash.

  • Dima Aryeh

    No camera review?

    • AaronGingrich

      Frankly, the camera wasn't great and I didn't think omitting an overview of it would be missed on a budget phone. Obviously I was wrong, and for that I apologize. I've added a bullet point for it under "The Bad" section. Sorry

      • Dima Aryeh

        No need to apologize, but thank you!

  • PINJ

    This Is Not A Budget Phone And Ppl Saying That Annoys The Sh*t Outta Me

    • New_Guy

      Then what would you presume it to be?

      • http://twitter.com/kuyanyan Yanyan | RR


      • thewild

        400$ off-contract and it is supposed to be a budget phone ??? Come on...
        THIS is a budget phone : http://www.origeek.com/wiko-cink-slim-smartphone
        140€ off-contract, dual core 1Ghz, 4", ICS. Specs are not as good as the LG's, but the price is way lower.
        You guys are always looking at the subsidized price while the real price is what you pay for the contract-free phone.

        • AaronGingrich

          The US market is a lot different than the European market. The vast majority of US consumers opt for subsidized phones, so the unsubsidized price isn't nearly so relevant. This is a budget phone.

          • thewild

            Do you mean that 400$ is budget for the US market and not the EU market, or that people will only buy subsidized phones in US and not in EU ? Because most people buy their phones subsidized in Europe too. It's just that
            comparing subsidized phone prices is comparing apples and oranges.
            You can only take the unsubsidized price into account because it is the real phone price.

          • New_Guy

            Exactly. As a Verizon customer the monthly service also does not change when you buy the phone full price so there is no distinct advantage there and the would indeed be a budget phone.

        • PINJ

          Not Even That Is A Budget Phone.

        • New_Guy

          Well, not sure how they do it at at&t but my contract is with Verizon where the monthly service price is the same no matter what the price of the phone. There is no advantage for not subsidizing the phone, in which case $50 from the carrier is budget all day long. Likely free from Amazon in a month. Unless you're the minute fraction who actually pays full price for the phone then yes, this is a budget phone.

      • PINJ

        High End Middle Class

  • http://profiles.google.com/marcusleejh Marcus Lee

    "... there are no small flagships anymore"

    Don't forget the iPhone 5 lol

    • PINJ

      4" Isn't Small. To Be Perfectly Honest, 4" Is Optimal For Most Hands In The World (Mine Included). I Had Slight Problems With My Sensation And Its Nearly Impossible With My ONe X.

      • http://profiles.google.com/marcusleejh Marcus Lee

        I think what constitutes "small" is relative in this case.

        If all the top-end phones now are 4.6" and above, then of course 4" would be considered small.

      • New_Guy

        4" is definitely small. I'm not even leaving room for personal preference here. I've passed on many Android devices in the past for being 4" and theirs were at least not as narrow. For $300 on contract I'd better be getting more than a 4" non-hd screen. Especially since everything is ran through the screen. Its like driving a Porsche with 13" rims. Sure it performs great but the part that actually touches the road is out of proportion.

  • brianna

    Not much space on mine and I have to have a 16 GB Sd card and I still get warnings of limited space sometimes :p other than that I like the set up of the home screen and google play (I HATED my windows phone -so this is def much better-)
    It is kind of cheapy though, like a rip off I phone lol

  • tinkicker

    Well...I'm qualified to say this because I've been paying my payments on an Escape since October 2012, and thanks to bricking it, I now have the newest version with Jellybean 4.1.2....this phone is really a great phone.
    In the interest of checking my perspective, whether I'm imagining it's better than it really is, I've played with a few friends' phones of different types. And when I say play, I mean doing so after I've generally cleaned out the clutter other folks allow to accumulate and clog the arteries, so I'm not seeing my clean inferior phone outrun the garbage-filled superior phones.
    By no means scientific, but my comparisons reassure me...my Escape "feels" like it runs better than a friend's SII, another SIII, assorted HTC's, and some I can't remember which right now. And the feel is what's important isn't it? Where the rubber meets the road?
    One interesting observation...the review states the cpu is a 1.2GHz Snapdragon...exactly what my first one had. Curiously, this latest Escape is running at 1.5GHz, according to CPU-Z. Factory bump up over time? Don't know. But I like it.
    And I can also say that Android 4.1.2 is MUCH more battery friendly than even 4.0.4 was in the first one. Every day I end up with 20%-40% more battery at the end of the day than before. Awesome!
    My only dislike since I've had it is the lack of camera flash. The back camera focuses nicely enough, but without extra lighting the pics come out yellowish-orange tinted a lot. The front camera is only what, 2MP? I don't know...but it's tinting is even worse. Fix the lighting and it actually takes really nice pics. I have several of my lawn after the first mowing and tending of this year when it really looked especially Garden of Eden-like, and the phone actually made it look BETTER lol.
    Did I say only dislike? The battery originally never lasted like I thought it should, so I upgraded to a 3150(?) battery over the smaller factory one, and even then it didn't give the approximately 50% longer life the numbers would suggest. Only after going to JB 4.1.2 did that get fixed. Very happy with battery life now. IMO, 4.1.2 should have been the OS from the start.
    Screen size: I'm not a huge guy...medium height, broad shoulders, average hands. This screen is perfect for me. I can't imagine trying to one-handed text on a bigger screen without dropping the thing, and this phone fits perfectly in my shirt pocket. I keep it there both so I can hear notifications over work noises and so that I won't crush it against machinery in my pants pocket or on a belt clip. I could just see trying to nest a phablet in my shirt pocket, like some sort of extra-dorky glasses holder or pocket protector. I can be dorky enough as it is.
    Had no idea the face is Gorilla Glass. Is it really? That's one of the items on my checklist for my next phone...maybe I'll just stick with my Escape. :D
    Debating on whether to try one or not? You won't be disappointed.