With a 1.4GHz single-core CPU, a majorly outdated version of Android, and a $50 price tag, the MyTouch Q is a hard sell to enthusiasts. (In fact, I'd bargain that literally no enthusiasts would buy it.) But as I explained just a few days ago, there's a lot more to the smartphone picture than devices that cost a few hundred dollars and can do everything short of make breakfast. A very large percentage of consumers have no desire to use their phone as a media streaming device or a mobile gaming powerhouse. They instead prefer to buy something simple that won't overwhelm them with gizmos they don't need, and save some cash in the process.

These consumers are lucky; historically, virtually all budget devices have been decidedly sub-par almost across the board. Now, though, there's a new wave of phones coming. They're a step up from feature phones in capability, but not in price. Many of these new bottom-rung smartphones are genuinely good. And after spending some time with the MTQ, I have a pretty good idea of where it falls on that spectrum. (Hint: all the way at the bottom. In fact, you'd have to expand the spectrum just to accommodate it, because it sets a brand-new low.)


T-Mobile MyTouch Q: Specs

  • CPU: 1.4GHz single-core CPU
  • RAM: 1GB
  • Storage: 4GB, mciroSD
  • Display: 4" WVGA (800x480)
  • Bands: GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (1700/2100)
  • Camera: 5MP Rear, 0.3MP front
  • Connectivity: 802.11b/g/n, Bluetooth 2.1
  • Price: $50 (with two-year contract), $350 retail

The Good:

  • Our more frequent visitors will know full well just what kind of wonders Android can offer. Any Android device inherently has worlds of potential regardless of hardware level. At $50 on contract, that world of potential is pretty affordable.
  • It has a full QWERTY keyboard, and a good one at that.
  • For a budget brick device, build quality is quite good, from the slider to the feel to the fit and finish.

The Bad:

  • Dramatically underspecced. 1.4GHz single core? In 2012? Even the Pantech Marauder - which is $50 cheaper - packs a 1.2GHz dual-core (Snapdragon, for that matter) CPU.
  • Gingerbread was released in December of 2010 - it's almost two full years old. I can't even conceive of a logical reason that explains why this phone is shipping with software that's 20 months and two major revisions outdated. That's like shipping a PC with Windows XP on it.
  • Because of the crap CPU and outdated version of Android, the performance just can't stand up to any modern device. It can't even stand up to the performance of year-old devices.
  • 0.6" is really thick for a phone, period. Doubly so considering there are numerous older devices with full QWERTY keyboards that are thinner.
  • 4GB of onboard storage and no microSD in the box. Factor in the space needed for bloat and Android, and you're looking at 2GB of usable storage.
  • $50 is about $250 too much for this phone. T-Mobile should be paying consumers to take it off their hands, especially since last-gen phones that are still far superior are available for free.

Deep Dive


wm_IMG_1567 wm_IMG_1559

As mentioned above, build quality is really quite excellent - one of the (very) few bright spots on the Q. The soft-touch materials used on the back are extremely grippy without being sticky, and feels absolutely fantastic. The feel is even better than most flagships, which tend to use drop-prone (and cold) aluminum or smooth, hard plastic. Picking up the soft MyTouch Q is a joy in comparison. The front and edges of the screen are generic glossy hard plastic. Nothing special - certainly bargain-bin plastic, but not bad.

wm_IMG_1564 wm_IMG_1563

The keyboard, too, feels pretty damn good. Whereas the (also budget) Marauder had soft, squishy, papery keys, the Q's are hard and clicky plastic - also a marked step up. The mechanical motion of the slider is equally as good, though again, I'm dubious of how well it will age over two years.



As I said with my review of the Marauder, a screen resolution of 480x800 may be very last-gen compared to the qHD and 720p displays of today, but it's really not terrible. The Q obviously packs fewer pixels per inch since it's a tad bit bigger, but you're not exactly counting pixels with either device. No reasonable consumer expects to buy a budget phone and get an HD screen, and to be honest, the people buying this phone probably don't know the difference anyway.

Pixels aside, it's thoroughly average, as you'll realize is the norm here. Black levels are probably the low point - think of the difference between the "black" of night and the blackness of a photo lab with the lights off and you'll have a good idea of what I mean. Colors are good but not great, and are otherwise unremarkable. The screen experiences serious gamma distortion even when viewed slightly off-center, but otherwise is acceptable even at extreme angles.


wm_IMG_1553 wm_IMG_1551 wm_IMG_1552

You know what makes an old, outdated phone better? Carrier bloat and mediocre manufacturer customizations. Oh, no, wait, that's how you make a shit device even worse. Gingerbread certainly wasn't much to look at 2 years ago, so I can understand the desire to slap a custom UI on top. And as I'll discuss below, it doesn't have a disastrous effect on UI performance (unlike, say, NinjaBlur). Some parts even look kinda-sorta good.

wm_IMG_1558 wm_IMG_1555 wm_IMG_1556

Still, on a device like this, it's best to stick to stock Android for two crucial reasons: first, it's leaner, so it will always run better and faster. On a drastically underpowered device like this, that's important. Second, because it won't slow down updates, which the Q is so badly in need of. I'm just going to go ahead and say it: if they hadn't bothered with a UI, they probably could have pulled an all-nighter or two and shipped the phone with Jelly Bean on board. Had they done so, the Q probably would be worlds better.


I've been an Android lover since Éclair (2.1), and my first Android phone (an EVO) had a 1GHz CPU and 512MB of RAM. By comparison, the Q has a 1.4GHz CPU and Gingerbread (2.3). Unfortunately, I don't even think it performs as well as a stock EVO running Gingerbread does, and it's two damn years newer.

wm_IMG_1566 wm_IMG_1565

While scrolling between homescreens or across menus isn't glaringly jittery, it's not nearly as smooth as you'd find on virtually any other current-gen Android device on the market. Actions like launching apps, though, are pretty bad. Most of the time, pressing the Genius button doesn't even launch the app, even though it triggers the haptic feedback. When it does launch, it usually takes a few seconds. It's not uncommon for other apps to take about a second to load, either.

Ultimately, if you look at the MyTouch Q on its own, the performance is mediocre. If you compare it to other budget devices - even cheaper ones like the Marauder - it's rather depressing, especially when you stop to consider that people will actually buy this thing. If performance kind of sucks today, it certainly isn't going to hold up well over the next two years.



I have to admit: this is by far the shortest review I've ever written of any device, and I can almost guarantee it will remain so. Because really, how much is there to say? It's as if T-Mobile and Huawei were doing some mid-year cleaning and found plans for a phone from early 2011 stuffed in a closet somewhere and thought, "%^*& it, why not now?"

I'm not sure what's worse: that Pantech can make a phone with high-end power and a much better UX that's $50 cheaper, or that T-Mobile sells the much, much better Amaze 4G for free while this costs $50. (Not to mention that the Galaxy Nexus' full retail price is only $50 more.)

Unless you want something that's a great paperweight and can double as a weapon when walking through dark alleys, I cannot recommend strongly enough that buyers look elsewhere in T-Mobile's portfolio. Build quality aside, the MyTouch Q is an absolute disaster.

Aaron Gingrich
Aaron is a geek who has always had a passion for technology. When not working or writing, he can be found spending time with his family, playing a game, or watching a movie.

  • Kenny O

    Devices like this do nothing but give Android a bad name. It provides a sub par user experience and contributes to fragmentation. Uneducated consumes are apt to pick this over last gen phones that are far superior just because it's new and then complain that their Android phone sucks.

    • Carmen Diva

      Devices like these are necessary for Android's growth because Not every person needs nor wants a Galaxy, Droid, Nexus, ONE, Xperia, Optimus, etc etc type device with killer specs.

      The community of android enthusiasts need to remember that while this phone does not appeal to YOU(which is hilarious when people spend time bashing a phone they never were going to buy in the first place), it does appeal to others .

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chad-Hudson/1441911433 Chad Hudson

    I'm so glad this wasn't my first android or I would never have got another one. I had the HTC MyTouch 4G (which was great) but the power button broke them it was discontinued. They replaced it with this piece of junk. Do not buy either of the LG my touch phones. I had other LG products in the past that were great, I don't know what they were thinking with this.

  • FrillArtist

    The sad part is that some people will get this device and forever swear off Android thinking this is either what Android is/all it has to offer or that all Android devices are like this.

  • Carmen Diva

    What i hate about android is not so much the phones themselves...it's the community behind them. I am doing some research for phones for my little cousin's b'day that are Mid-range, I come to a review to see the first paragraph or two is essentially cutting the phone down and not getting to the point....

    We get it...it's not a ONE Series Phone, not a galaxy, Not a Droid, Not an EVO, Not a Nexus...but some of the stuff in this review is nit-picking.

    NO SD card in a budget phone? Keyword...budget. Had this been a Galaxy Note without an SD card I would understand.

    The interesting part is...The phone comes with GB(which understandably so, I can get why that may be a big deal) but the fact that 1 GHZ or 1.2GHZ is considered crap for a BUDGET phone.

    This review...no.

  • Michael

    My HTC Nexus One phone that I bought brand new two and a half years ago has the same specs as this phone, except this one has a 1.4 GHz processor instead of 1 GHz for Nexus One, and no front camera for N1. Still my 2.5 years old scratched phone sells for $70 online, used. If this phone is $50 (10 times cheaper than the latest phones) I would totally buy it.

    • Michael

      Actually cannot see this phone for $50 on t-mobile.com website. All phones available there seem to require a 2-year contract. I thought $50 is for a contract free phone.

  • frank

    Yes its a slow device,I have one in which iam using as I post this.but I don't need a 600 dollar phone with crap on it I will never use.this phone gets whatever I need to do.its a good textin pnone and iam mostly on wi-fi,so its all really not bad.I don't stream shit,nor do I download anything on 4G...there's nothing out there that can't wait untill iam home to acess my P.C. hell even if I wanted to get a new sam gal 3 my wife would kick right square in the ass....now Aaron you wouldent want that now ,would you ???

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002064445650 Rick Sterman

    Not that bad - I got dragged into the smart phone thing. Am actually fairly PC literate, but I felt stupid taking this thing home.
    Was like learning how to fly to Mars - but I read and read and soon loaded my own media on it.
    I had thought it was a decent piece of hardware limited by its older software - and it would appear that assessment was at least partially correct.

    Tried mkvs, but it likes MP4s, I can play HD on other devices, don't need that here.

    Audio, sure the tiny speaker blows, but it works good for speaker phone and general use. I got a lossless wav file on the player, and on headphones it is SWEET and CLEAN.

    Is my first jump in the market, and while I do hope to maybe jump it to at least 3.0 something Android - it works GREAT as it is. Just know what it can do and live with it.

    Been like 10 days now and is the coolest piece of 'swiss army knife' type technology, I've ever seen, and definitely, the niftiest little gadget.

    As I said, I am new, but I feel good with the device, feel I can grow into it and am having really no complaints. Streaming radio at home has been awesome and don't use much battery, either.

    Cool phone and the writer's review is likely fair, but compared to the phone I left behind, this thing is more like a 'TriCorder' to me....

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002064445650 Rick Sterman

    Love how it handles my Skype account natively, if I choose. Could have gotten amuch lower minute plan had I known that....

  • Dennis Lebman

    It's not $50....its a $50 deposit and $15/mo for 20 months on a new contract!

  • ricky

    I bought this phone about 8 months ago and was just curious what the reviews were like on it and this review actually notes ALL the positive aspects of this phone and doesn't give justice to how crappy this phone is. Yes, of coarse its a budget phone and doesn't have all of the features and speed of a high-end phone but I'm telling you this phone does NOT work I have all kinds of problems on it and I use less than half of the available memory. It doesn't send picture messages consistantly and sometimes I don't receive phone calls on it. This phone is a nightmare to own if this is the only smartphone you can afford then don't get a smartphone its not worth it.