17
Jul
wm_IMG_2580

The portable Bluetooth speaker is fast becoming a standard accessory in our increasingly tablet and smartphone-centric world. But with so many options out there, how do you know which one is actually the good buy? Having used several, when I saw Braven's line unveiled earlier this year, I was intrigued. Not only did they look good, Braven promised high functionality to go with that sleek form factor. What did make me a little suspicious is the fact that Braven isn't actually a new name in the business - they previously marketed their speakers as the Spar Zephyr line, and have undergone a makeover for their next generation of hardware (which looks exactly like the previous generation).

wm_IMG_2546

wm_IMG_2568 wm_IMG_2575

The Braven 600 is the company's "entry-level" model, though that's more in the BMW 3-series rather than Ford Focus sense of the word, as it comes with a $150 price tag. Braven offers only three products at present, the 600, the 625S (a ruggedized take on the 600), and the 650. While I really wanted to get my hands on the range-topping 650, the 600 actually left such an impression that I'm now curious how much better-sounding the 650 could actually be.

Two speaker drivers with matching passive subwoofers power the 600, for a total power output of 6w - 2 more than the comparable Jambox. Wattage, if you're unfamiliar with the term as used with speakers, is a measure of power output, and corresponds to a large degree with the level of loudness a speaker is capable of producing. More watts, more noise (note that it doesn't mean better noise).

For such a pint-sized package (see photos), the Braven 600 produces sound of a volume significantly higher than one would expect. It's no stereo replacement, but it is not meant to be. The sound it produces is also of a fairly astonishing quality given its diminutive nature (and even its price).

However, your real question is probably this (I'm guessing): how does it stack up against the current Bluetooth speaker incumbent, Jawbone's Jambox? And I will cut to the chase, for those of you wondering. It's better in the ways that actually matter - sound and functionality. Aside from hardware controls and software, where the Jambox still reins supreme, the Braven 600 is just better. And cheaper. And good cheap things are... well, good.

wm_IMG_2557

wm_IMG_2566 wm_IMG_2571 wm_IMG_2578

Braven 600

  • What is it? A portable Bluetooth speaker.
  • How much? $150 (Amazon).
  • What's in the box? Speaker, A/C adapter with microUSB charging cable, male-to-male 3.5mm stereo cable, and as a bonus, the most frustrating retail packaging in existence.
  • What's so special about it? It can charge your phone, you can daisy-chain multiple Bravens with the included 3.5mm cable, and it's made of a big piece of aluminum.
  • Do I want it? Do you want a very small and versatile portable Bluetooth speaker with great sound? Then this is probably the one to get.

The Good

  • Sound: The Braven 600 puts out sound that I simply did not expect, and in the best way. Unlike the Jambox, which is so bass-forward that sound actually becomes garbled when you crank it up, the Braven 600 provides a balanced listening experience across the range. Bass is weaker than the Jambox, but it's also not nearly as distorted at high volumes (a very bass-heavy track will still elicit the characteristic "flapping" sound of a maxed subwoofer when the volume is high). The two passive subwoofers do make sure the low frequencies aren't lost, but from over five feet away, it's pretty hard to tell the difference between the Jambox and the Braven's bass response, as it's lost so quickly at a distance. The Braven also just sounds a lot more clear and less tinny (the Jambox sounds very hollow by comparison) overall. Volume on the Braven is better than the Jambox as well, you can definitely push it noticeably further. In terms of raw sonic quality, the Braven 600 is miles ahead of the Jambox, and I doubt anything else at this price point could really provide it a serious challenge.
  • Battery Life: Braven promises 12 hours of battery life, but let's be real about this. It's a portable speaker, and battery life is going to be even more ridiculously subjective than something like a smartphone or tablet. There's a 1400mAh cell in the 600, and I haven't had to charge it since receiving it. It's at the very least comparable to the Jambox in this regard, so it gets a pass in my book.
  • Added Functionality: You can use the Braven 600 as your own personal power bank to charge up your phone. While the 1400mAh cell will probably drain fairly quickly even over USB trickle charging, it's a great added feature that just makes sense. Most people won't be using this device in a capacity where it'll run out of juice before returning to its charger, but if you're pumping tunes from your smartphone, it's a convenient little feature to have on the go. Additionally, the ability to daisy-chain (output the same sound to multiple speakers) Bravens using the included 3.5mm stereo cable is really cool. This also means it can pump sound into any speaker with a 3.5mm audio-in jack, so you could even hook it in to a Jambox. And it also works as a speakerphone, hooray!
  • Build Quality / Design: There's no denying that the Braven is a striking piece of hardware. It also feels ridiculously solid - the aluminum covers everything but the end-caps, and has absolutely no give or tendency to bend whatsoever. As for the design, I guess that's a matter of taste. I like the look of the Braven, but I don't love it. Personally, I think the Jambox's minimalistic all-black look is a little more modern, but hey, it's a portable speaker, do you really care?
  • Connectivity: Bluetooth connectivity was quick and painless, as it should be. The 3.5mm audio-in jack works, but its impedance is just too high for a smartphone headphone amp, audio comes through noticeably quieter when you're using the cable.

The Not So Good

  • Controls: The tiny little effing buttons on this thing are stupidly hard to use. Seriously, why can't we just use a dial knob or a wheel or something for the volume? Using buttons, unless they're ridiculously large and easily found (as on the Jambox), is dumb dumb dumb.
  • Rubber Feet: There are two little rubber "feet" on the bottom of the Braven that are glued onto the aluminum chassis to stabilize it. I can't help but feel that, one day, they will start to peel off. This fear may be totally irrational, but it's the one piece of the whole thing that I don't have confidence in the quality of.
  • Bluetooth Audio: Bluetooth audio still isn't perfected. Cutouts occasionally (rarely) happen, and the quality is good, not great. Let me put it this way: you know you're losing something. But if you're using it for movies, TV, and games, that's less of a concern. As a wannabe-audiophile, I can say this isn't how I want to listen to my music, but it's much more bearable than the similar alternatives.
  • Software: There isn't any. No companion app, no firmware update system, nada. This is where the Jambox gains a lot of points back, in my mind. I want to know how much battery my speaker has remaining. I want to adjust the device volume from 5 feet away instead of using those infuriatingly small buttons. Is this stuff necessary? No. Is it a nice touch? Without a doubt.
  • Smudging: Dark gray anodized aluminum aluminum shows fingerprints and smudges. It's not a big deal, but hey, I noticed it, and figured it was worth a mention.
  • Packaging: The most frustrating packaging ever. Yes, worse than the Jambox. Why do these sorts of things need to be encased in a clear, hard plastic shell held together by copious amounts of tape and pure evil? Put it in a box, and put a picture of the damn thing on the front. It seems very, very unwise to make your customer begin their experience with your product with agonizing frustration and anger.

wm_IMG_2591

wm_IMG_2594 wm_IMG_2584 

To wrap things up, if you're looking for a very portable Bluetooth speaker at a reasonable price (eg, cheaper than a Jambox), I'd say this is the one you'd want to go with. That, or its big brother, the Braven 650 (the 650 has a larger battery and upgraded speaker drivers). Braven has put out a high-quality piece of hardware at a price that I think is very competitive given its performance, and I don't think you can ask for much more than that.

wm_IMG_2558

David Ruddock
David's phone is an HTC One. He is an avid writer, and enjoys playing devil's advocate in editorials, imparting a legal perspective on tech news, and reviewing the latest phones and gadgets. He also doesn't usually write such boring sentences.

  • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

    Sound quality and volume, as well as the ability to chain are pretty much the only things I felt my Jambox was lacking. I actually like the way the Braven looks a lot more too. And it's cheaper. The 650 is pretty drool-worthy.

  • ChrisLH

    I have a Jawbone while I love the portability, I've found the bass to have too much distortion and the volume is ridiculously low.

    Thanks for the review because I'm looking to upgrade to something that sounds better and gets louder.

    • Diogo Myrrha

      I was on the same boat: I do not like the artificial excess bass of the Jambox. Love my Braven650, though. Perfect sub.

  • http://twitter.com/dynomike666 Mike

    I really like my Bose Soundlink. It products amazing sound for such a portable product (though not as portable as the Jawbone or this) and has all the limitations of Bluetooth audio as stated here. It's very expensive, but I've compared it with the Jawbone and the sound is night and day different. So are the prices, however.

  • fixxmyhead

    can i get a hell no for that price tag

    • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

      Compared to the Jambox, it's actually very reasonable. Especially considering it's better. I love portable speakers - they make travel so very much better.

      • http://www.facebook.com/eric.thompson.5815 Eric Thompson

        Yeah I still think inflation and supply and demand is at work here I mane $200 headphones you can get some very good ones; shure, beyerdaynamic, sennheiser, and speakers are the same way, but when you want small and wireless the price seems to skyrocket, or stay the same for less performance.

  • fixxmyhead

    can i get a hell no for that price tag

  • http://twitter.com/ToysSamurai Toys Samurai

    So, the latency is good enough for viewing videos?

    • http://www.androidpolice.com/ David Ruddock

      It was fine for me.

    • Diogo Myrrha

      Totally fine. Tons better than the Jambox.

      • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

        I found that it depends more on the transmitting device than an individual BT speaker. Or rather, software on the device. My EVO LTE has BT lag on everything I try, any player, any BT device. But the Epic Touch's built-in Videos app works on all BT devices and makes up for the lag by offsetting audio (is my guess). The EVO LTE doesn't even have a stock video app. Chalk another one up to Samsung.

  • http://twitter.com/thepowerofscott Scott Nienhuis

    Thanks for the interesting review, I've been looking for a good, cost-effective BT speaker to use interchangeably with my notebook and ps3 (and phone of course) and this might be the winner

  • Thaddeus Dannar

    Perfect for the pool!

  • http://www.facebook.com/eric.thompson.5815 Eric Thompson

    Does the 650 actually have better speakers? I thought it was just the battery. I wish I could rig one of these to run off of a replaceable 3100mah 18650.

    I'm trying to decide between this, the Solemate, or something similar. For the larger ones you mite as well get the Bose soundlink or UE Boombox and never look back.

    • Matt H

      I agree - I don't believe the 650 has better speakers - it has better Bluetooth audio capabilities (APTX) which is a codec not yet supported by iOS devices (but is supported on Macbooks). You'd have to check if your Android phone supports it.