19
Apr
gplay_logo_g_thumb3

After what was a pretty obvious application of the ICANN anti-squatting policy, it seems Google has now gained control of GooglePlay.com from an ad-serving Japanese squatter. Google filed a complaint under ICANN anti-squatting regulations, and after the case's short stint at the National Arbitration Forum (a non-court but legally binding decision-making body in the US), Google now shows as the registrant of GooglePlay.com.

A quick 'whois' of the domain yields the following:

Registrant Name: DNS Admin
Registrant Organization: Google Inc.
Registrant Street1: 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Registrant Street2: 
Registrant City: Mountain View
Registrant State: California
Registrant Postal Code: 94043
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: 16506234000
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Email: dns-admin@google.com

While the page in question still loads, it shows that the domain has been seized (according to Google Translate), and a change in registrant information usually indicates that either the squatter has given up the domain freely, or a decision has been reached and the domain seized by ICANN, beginning the process of transfer of ownership.

Either way, it looks like GooglePlay.com is at least on its way into the hands of Google.

via Fusible

David Ruddock
David's phone is whatever is currently sitting on his desk. He is an avid writer, and enjoys playing devil's advocate in editorials, and reviewing the latest phones and gadgets. He also doesn't usually write such boring sentences.

  • http://twitter.com/redbullcat Phil Oakley

    Good! Now Google need to get GooglePlus.com. AFAIK, it isn't owned by anybody yet.

    • William

      Google already has it. Just because the domain doesn't load doesn't mean that no body owns it. It's just improperly DNS set up towards Google Plus.

      Registrant:
      DNS Admin
      Google Inc.
      1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
      Mountain View CA 94043
      US
      dns-admin@google.com +1.6506234000 Fax: +1.6506188571

      Created on..............: 2002-04-11.
      Expires on..............: 2013-04-11.
      Record last updated on..: 2012-03-10.

      • http://twitter.com/redbullcat Phil Oakley

        Fair enough...websites, DNS etc aren't my strong point. I'm better with apps :D

        So why is it improperly set up? Surely Google want to make it work?

        • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

          It's just not been set up at all by Google. Why is anyone's guess.

      • http://www.androidpolice.com/ Artem Russakovskii

        Indeed, Google already owns it. It's odd that they're not using it, even just as a redirect.

  • http://meatcastle.com/ bwbloom

    Oh man, my buddy from college is going to pissed when he finds out this is possible.

    He and another guy started snatching up domains they considered might be valuable and have been paying to simply hold them down every year.

    HAHA now I don't need to worry about missing out on getting in on the ground floor of Being A Dick Enterprises.

    • Clint Pedersen

      Well, that may or may not be an issue. It's an issue of your buddy is purchasing domains with the intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. In this case, Google.

      However, it is totally legal to purchase domains that could be seen as valuable. For example, let's say your buddy purchased http://www.ilikepickles.com. 2 years later, a company is formed called I Like Pickles. They cannot force your buddy to give up ownership of his domain since he had no idea that someone would start a company with that name.

      • http://meatcastle.com/ bwbloom

        I can't tell what that means for me.
        Should I go back to worrying about missing out on the opportunity of a lifetime?

        • Eric dube

          Aka if they bought the name of an existing company in hopes they will want it, they will lose. If they bought domains for fun (I like pickles) and then a company comes out with a product called I like pickles then they will have to buy you out. Simple?

    • Candace

      Hey

  • Madfatter

    this is such bullshit. just becasue a company is huge and has endless resources, they should not be allowed to wrestle a domain out from someone, even if they are squatting. Its completly unacceptable that this is allowed. So what if this guy bought it with the intent to profit off of it. This is no different than collecting something with the intent to sell it later at a profit.

  • yasmeen

    How do i download the google play store app on my nook color