<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Meet Andy: Android’s History In A Nutshell</title> <atom:link href="http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/07/29/meet-andy-android%e2%80%99s-history-in-a-nutshell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/07/29/meet-andy-android%e2%80%99s-history-in-a-nutshell/</link> <description>Looking after everything Android</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Ron Hamelin</title><link>http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/07/29/meet-andy-android%e2%80%99s-history-in-a-nutshell/comment-page-1/#comment-48297</link> <dc:creator>Ron Hamelin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 07:25:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidpolice.com/?p=8944#comment-48297</guid> <description>Kellic: thanks for your response. I&#039;m not sure I stated that smartphones weren&#039;t smart but that they were &quot;boring.&quot; I think it&#039;s pretty much undisputed that the iPhone and Android devices have pushed smartphones to a whole new level of functionality or, as you say, &quot;freshness.&quot; However, even then, I think &quot;freshness&quot; is an understatement as today&#039;s devices do far more than the devices used before 2006. Sure, today&#039;s devices are fresher, but they&#039;re also faster, have greatly improved UIs, and the hardware is much more pleasing to the eye than before.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kellic: thanks for your response. I'm not sure I stated that smartphones weren't smart but that they were "boring." I think it's pretty much undisputed that the iPhone and Android devices have pushed smartphones to a whole new level of functionality or, as you say, "freshness." However, even then, I think "freshness" is an understatement as today's devices do far more than the devices used before 2006. Sure, today's devices are fresher, but they're also faster, have greatly improved UIs, and the hardware is much more pleasing to the eye than before.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: donnythebowler</title><link>http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/07/29/meet-andy-android%e2%80%99s-history-in-a-nutshell/comment-page-1/#comment-47827</link> <dc:creator>donnythebowler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:56:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidpolice.com/?p=8944#comment-47827</guid> <description>Fair enough.  My bad.  I just hate for Sense to get the credit where, I feel, the HW and Android deserve the credit.
I stand corrected, but I&#039;d like to point out that I stated, &quot;In my case&quot; to differentiate my self from your &quot;to many&quot;.
Good article, BTW!!  I need to apologize a 2nd time for not pointing that out before nitpicking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  My bad.  I just hate for Sense to get the credit where, I feel, the HW and Android deserve the credit.</p><p>I stand corrected, but I'd like to point out that I stated, "In my case" to differentiate my self from your "to many".</p><p>Good article, BTW!!  I need to apologize a 2nd time for not pointing that out before nitpicking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ron Hamelin</title><link>http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/07/29/meet-andy-android%e2%80%99s-history-in-a-nutshell/comment-page-1/#comment-47825</link> <dc:creator>Ron Hamelin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:41:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidpolice.com/?p=8944#comment-47825</guid> <description>Exactly, which is why I stated &quot;to many,&quot; not &quot;to everyone. &quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, which is why I stated "to many," not "to everyone. "</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: donnythebowler</title><link>http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/07/29/meet-andy-android%e2%80%99s-history-in-a-nutshell/comment-page-1/#comment-47824</link> <dc:creator>donnythebowler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:38:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidpolice.com/?p=8944#comment-47824</guid> <description>&quot;Its 4.3&quot; screen and Sense UI interface is, to many, a better choice than the iPhone 4.&quot;
Correct, except for the Sense part.  In my case, it was *despite* the Sense interface.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Its 4.3" screen and Sense UI interface is, to many, a better choice than the iPhone 4."</p><p>Correct, except for the Sense part.  In my case, it was *despite* the Sense interface.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kellic</title><link>http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/07/29/meet-andy-android%e2%80%99s-history-in-a-nutshell/comment-page-1/#comment-47772</link> <dc:creator>Kellic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:39:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidpolice.com/?p=8944#comment-47772</guid> <description>I&#039;m sorry but that&#039;s a load of ****.  As much as I loath Windows Mobile 6.x the apps on it were solid.  I was browsing websites years ago with WM6 and it worked.  Some of the apps available for WM6 were pretty damn slick for the time.  So to say smartphones weren&#039;t smart is just plain wrong.
What Apple and Android brought to the table though was freshness.  Microsoft and RIM had let their OS&#039;s stagnate for years without any real forward advancements.  Apple and Android kicked them out of their complacency.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sorry but that's a load of ****.  As much as I loath Windows Mobile 6.x the apps on it were solid.  I was browsing websites years ago with WM6 and it worked.  Some of the apps available for WM6 were pretty damn slick for the time.  So to say smartphones weren't smart is just plain wrong.<br
/> What Apple and Android brought to the table though was freshness.  Microsoft and RIM had let their OS's stagnate for years without any real forward advancements.  Apple and Android kicked them out of their complacency.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Artem Russakovskii</title><link>http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/07/29/meet-andy-android%e2%80%99s-history-in-a-nutshell/comment-page-1/#comment-47744</link> <dc:creator>Artem Russakovskii</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:10:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidpolice.com/?p=8944#comment-47744</guid> <description>Great writeup, Ron. Android newbs looking for a quick history will appreciate your efforts.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great writeup, Ron. Android newbs looking for a quick history will appreciate your efforts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
